IKEA Logo

Assembly Required – Evaluating and improving IKEA.com’s user journey

Evaluating the shopping experience and usability of IKEA's online platform

Project Overview

client

IKEA

Role

UX Researcher

focus

Website Evaluation, Usability Testing

scope

Product Browsing, Store Locator, Search Experience

Research Process

Heuristic Evaluation

Conducted detailed heuristic evaluation to identify usability issues and pain points

Usability Testing

Conducted user testing with target audience using think-aloud protocol

Data Analysis

Analyzed user feedback and behavior to identify patterns and insights

Key Findings

Identified Pain Points

  • Inconsistent user experience across different paths
  • Ambiguous terminology and product descriptions
  • Confusing product naming schemes with similar base names
  • Missing or hard to find key information
  • Vague product information and specifications

Study Focus Areas

  • Evaluating browse, search, and site navigation experience
  • Assessing user satisfaction with search results relevance
  • Evaluating how well IKEA.com represents brand values
  • Comparing online and in-store experience alignment

Testing Methodology

  • Online screening questionnaire for participant selection
  • Pre-study questionnaire for shopping habits and brand impression
  • 4 task-based tests with think-aloud protocol
  • Post-task ratings and feedback collection
  • Post-test questionnaire for overall satisfaction

Target Audience

Participant Profile

  • Adults (working professionals and students) who are budget-conscious and looking to furnish a new residence
  • Live within driving distance of an IKEA retail store

Participant Demographics

  • 6 participants

    • 3 working professionals

    • 3 students

  • 2 male, 4 female in the Age range 18-35

Data Collected

Outcome

We presented the results of the study and a written report that summarizes the findings. The report included the key usability issues, their severity which were discovered from the test, what worked well for participants and what did not, and participant comments. The report also suggested high-level recommendations and next steps to consider.

Back to Portfolio